Dr. Jane Clare Jones
38 posts todayIs this like that time Ash Sarkar thought Julie Bindel had never done anything for women in prison? https://t.co/K8dBnj...
Is this like that time Ash Sarkar thought Julie Bindel had never done anything for women in prison? https://t.co/K8dBnj...
Given that people on your side call all instances of correctly sexing someone 'misgendering' then no, not all instances would constitute harassment. Harassment is harassment. It's a behaviour, directed at someone. https://t.co/79pN59...
Yes, it would be lawful for someone to tell someone who has had an abortion that they consider it to be murder in the context of a discussion. It would be harassment to repeatedly come up and call them a murderer. And if you can't tell the difference ...
How art thou a Nazi. Let me count the ways. https://t.co/S3JN14...
RT @boodleoops: These kinds of response show that they don’t actually understand what the case was about, or what the context was. It was about the right of gender critical people not to be subject to harassment and discrimination. A right that trans ...
Dear lying revisionists. We are free to say we think transgender ideology is bullshit and you cannot threaten our jobs. Spin that any fucking way you like. ...
'Nobody ever tried to threaten those women's jobs or get them disciplined, we didn't no platform them, we never accused them of being nazis and said their speech made us unsafe, we never surrounded their meetings and called them scum and tried to ...
RT @glosswitch: "Reassurances" that feminists having the right to speak doesn't mean they have the right to harass aren't intended to reassure, but to reposition feminists as aggressors rather than victims of age-old policing of women's speech about ...
RT @OnTheWomanQ: Too late for tokenism now. You’ve already shown your hand. https://t.co/JN7DBh...
RT @akuareindorf: Widely predicted & legally entirely correct outcome. Really well reasoned judgment too. Helpful & necessary clarification that the threshold for whether a belief is “worthy of respect” is the ECHR Art 17 standard, ie a ...
Great, so can we all now agree that believing in the immutability of sex and that sex matters doesn't constitute harassment. And that is is wrong and slanderous to compare those views to antisemitism, racism or bigotry. https://t.co/XgJaq2...
RT @lecanardnoir: Th Empire of Gender is collapsing. It’s legal, social and scientific foundational weaknesses have all now been exposed and it can no longer bear the weight of its own contradictions and lies.
RT @tryingattimes: Quite. Best start walking the walk, Katy. https://t.co/oLQ2G4...
RT @peter_daly: The Forstater Judgment: What Next? https://t.co/JHJWhg...
Right side of history. https://t.co/8yAu1F...
RT @ednawelthorpe: Not yet five hours old. But not aging at all well. https://t.co/Xdilfv...
EHRC statement on Forstater Judgement https://t.co/Nv0jpp... https://t.co/uGGgMh...
RT @KJ_Harrison: Strategic genius Kier Starmer jumps wholeheartedly into the identity swamp just as smart people are getting out. A dismal betrayal of women, LGB’s & many others including trans people like me who reject discriminatory ‘self-ID’ ...
Yes. And now women whop believe sex is immutable must be treated with dignity and respect at work. Which is a good thing, don't you think TUC? https://t.co/4EQB4w...
RT @TybilAlper: Shameful. This case is not about harassment of trans people. It is about the right of workers to hold and express a belief that sex is real, and matters, with facing discrimination. A belief shared by the vast majority of people, ...
That is very interesting to know. https://t.co/zTHK8z...
Okay, TRAs, you seem to be having some comprehension issues: 1. Believing humans are sexed, sex is immutable, and that sex matters, is not harassment. 2. Not believing in gender identity is not harassment. 3. Harassing people is harassment. Okay. Ar ...
The extent to which TRAs gaslight themselves with their own propaganda is fucking WILD. https://t.co/LPZHCr...
RT @hatpinwoman: What a good egg ❤️ https://t.co/c7G0Ks...
Given the TRAs misrepresented the original case as being about the right to misgender people willy nilly, they are now going to claim that b/c the judgement explicitly disallows this that we didn't win, despite the fact this was the argument *made by ...
The highlighted section is, in fact, the argument made by Maya's QC. We were never arguing for the right to misgender trans people in a harassing way. We were arguing for the right to not believe transgender ideology, and for people to not be able to ...
Lack of belief in gender identity is also protected. #IStandWithMayaFors... https://t.co/hGT2Fq...
British law now says: Gender critical feminists are not Nazis. It is insane we needed to law to say this. But we really really did. #IStandWithMayaFors... https://t.co/Qhvi3C...
RT @ProfAliceS: Maya has sacrificed so much, and shown such courage. A heroine for civil liberties and women's rights. https://t.co/fe5maL...
RT @JohnMcM1: Maya Forstater @MForstater has won her Employment Appeal tribunal, with the appeal tribunal judges saying the original tribunal erred in law and that Ms Forstater's beliefs do fall within section 10 of the Equality Act. @BBCNews
Judgement! https://t.co/n50EDm...
RT @Jebadoo2: Full Judgment here people https://t.co/f0jaoc...
Humans are sexed. SEX MATTERS. #IStandWithMayaFors... https://t.co/7x1TkF...
RT @suzanne_moore: YES she has won #I stand with MayaForstater
PUUUUUUULLLLLLLLLLL... https://t.co/k8cM51...
OMG breathe. #IStandWithMayaFors...
How fucking original. https://t.co/6otU8l...
RT @crit_gen: Thought I'd ordered too much. Then I saw Keir Starmer's statement about self id. #LabourLosingWomen #WomenWontWheesht https://t.co/bT3n8q...