Dr. Jane Clare Jones

 

10 June 2021

 

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

Given that people on your side call all instances of correctly sexing someone 'misgendering' then no, not all instances would constitute harassment. Harassment is harassment. It's a behaviour, directed at someone. https://t.co/79pN59...

June 10th @ 3:50 pm |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

Yes, it would be lawful for someone to tell someone who has had an abortion that they consider it to be murder in the context of a discussion. It would be harassment to repeatedly come up and call them a murderer. And if you can't tell the difference ...

June 10th @ 3:43 pm |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

RT @boodleoops: These kinds of response show that they don’t actually understand what the case was about, or what the context was. It was about the right of gender critical people not to be subject to harassment and discrimination. A right that trans ...

June 10th @ 3:03 pm |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

'Nobody ever tried to threaten those women's jobs or get them disciplined, we didn't no platform them, we never accused them of being nazis and said their speech made us unsafe, we never surrounded their meetings and called them scum and tried to ...

June 10th @ 2:45 pm |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

RT @glosswitch: "Reassurances" that feminists having the right to speak doesn't mean they have the right to harass aren't intended to reassure, but to reposition feminists as aggressors rather than victims of age-old policing of women's speech about ...

June 10th @ 10:43 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

RT @akuareindorf: Widely predicted & legally entirely correct outcome. Really well reasoned judgment too. Helpful & necessary clarification that the threshold for whether a belief is “worthy of respect” is the ECHR Art 17 standard, ie a ...

June 10th @ 10:37 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

Great, so can we all now agree that believing in the immutability of sex and that sex matters doesn't constitute harassment. And that is is wrong and slanderous to compare those views to antisemitism, racism or bigotry. https://t.co/XgJaq2...

June 10th @ 10:30 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

RT @KJ_Harrison: Strategic genius Kier Starmer jumps wholeheartedly into the identity swamp just as smart people are getting out. A dismal betrayal of women, LGB’s & many others including trans people like me who reject discriminatory ‘self-ID’ ...

June 10th @ 8:42 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

RT @TybilAlper: Shameful. This case is not about harassment of trans people. It is about the right of workers to hold and express a belief that sex is real, and matters, with facing discrimination. A belief shared by the vast majority of people, ...

June 10th @ 8:37 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

Okay, TRAs, you seem to be having some comprehension issues: 1. Believing humans are sexed, sex is immutable, and that sex matters, is not harassment. 2. Not believing in gender identity is not harassment. 3. Harassing people is harassment. Okay. Ar ...

June 10th @ 7:00 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

Given the TRAs misrepresented the original case as being about the right to misgender people willy nilly, they are now going to claim that b/c the judgement explicitly disallows this that we didn't win, despite the fact this was the argument *made by ...

June 10th @ 6:47 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

The highlighted section is, in fact, the argument made by Maya's QC. We were never arguing for the right to misgender trans people in a harassing way. We were arguing for the right to not believe transgender ideology, and for people to not be able to ...

June 10th @ 6:26 am |

Dr. Jane Clare Jones

38 posts today

RT @JohnMcM1: Maya Forstater @MForstater has won her Employment Appeal tribunal, with the appeal tribunal judges saying the original tribunal erred in law and that Ms Forstater's beliefs do fall within section 10 of the Equality Act. @BBCNews

June 10th @ 5:45 am |