Dr. Jane Clare Jones
28 posts todayBoom. https://t.co/B4sOC1...
Boom. https://t.co/B4sOC1...
RT @lecanardnoir: I’m always fascinated about the questions gender ideologist refuse to answer. A well constructed question, of course, can expose weaknesses in a position. So much so, sometimes, that people will go to extreme lengths to pretend the ...
RT @FrancisWheen: @janeclarejones Peahen (sighing): “Oh DO put it away, dear. Don’t you realise you’re normalising bioessentialist conceptions?” https://t.co/YnFdP3...
Remember, every time someone calls women asserting the reality of sex 'transphobic,' denies there is a rights conflict, or claims there is 'no debate,' what they are saying is 'women should have no say in their own existence and definition in law and ...
RT @GoonerProf: Hello @LSEnews and @LSEGenderTweet. Shall we discuss your defamation of me and members of @OU_GCN and your breach of your stutory duties on academic freedom and the Equakity Act? We have given you many opportunities this week to put ...
I completely despair of this generation of meme-chanting, thought-terminating... woman-hating, tin-pot jumped-up students. https://t.co/dM9FLr...
RT @ElectricAgora: Occasionally, the right thing happens. ⚡️ “Rudy Giuliani’s law license was suspended over his support for Trump's election lies” by @nytimes https://t.co/QnQD7w...
'Women who focus on female people's rights have no right to use suffragette colours because in the early 20th century a male who had been raised as a girl won the legal right to be recognised as male and that person cared about women's rights.' Um. ...
Oh for fucking fucks sake. We are NOT gendering animals. We are sexing them. Sex is not assigned. Sex is LITERALLY IN THE BODY. What the actual fuck is wrong with you. https://t.co/r7vuUA...
*Stamps feet* It's funny how the 'love and tolerance' people are always the ones so free with their expressions of moral disgust. What's 'gross' about female ppl campaigning for the rights of female ppl placing themselves in the line of female ppl ...
Accuses me of hatemongering, provides no receipts, refuses to reply to my comments and requests for evidence, and then blocks me. Classy. And they wonder why we are winning while this is their idea of 'the right side of history.' ...
RT @FrancisWheen: @ForwomenScot Riddell should have consulted a libel lawyer before tweeting that. She accuses @sleeepysandy @janeclarejones and others of spreading hate, which I think she'd struggle to prove in court.
'ALLOWED'????? Fern, you and others who are implicated in the absolute failure of UK institutional feminism to stand up for women's rights do not get to legislate what women are ALLOWED to do, or what symbols they are ALLOWED to use. Who the fuck do ...
A movement that has appropriated a) third gender cultures b) the history of slavery and segregation c) pretty much every GNC person who ever lived d) the holocaust e) the oppression of every oppressed group in existence, now has the absolute brass ...
I think I'll leave legal opinion to someone who doesn't just make completely unsubstantiated assertions. And TRAs can speak as much BS about Forstater as you like. The RA still had to apologise to Jess. Because your defamatory nonsense is now in ...
'Whenever I come into contact with someone who studies the history of female people campaigning for the rights of female people I need them to make an explicit disavowal that they no longer believe in the rights of female people as a political ...
We are well aware that it's a concept you have trouble with. https://t.co/nl15O5...
Fern, seeing as you have used me as one of your examples I would like you to provide clear receipts for what I have said that is hateful and justifies you comparing me to anti-vaxxers and far right ideologues. All I have ever said in public is that ...
If there's a rights conflict, where one group is trying to appropriate something from another, and they're enforcing that appropriation by claiming anyone who says there's rights conflict is a bigot, then you are colluding with the appropriating ...
The thing they cannot grasp, we don't need to align with anyone but ourselves. This movement is for ourselves. It is oriented around our needs. We have no obligation to centre other people and have betrayed no one. Go and make your own thing and ...
This is spot on. Some rights are not a pie. Access to spaces is precisely a pie. Spaces are either organised by sex or by gender. And if you insist they are organised by gender, you are removing women's rights to single sex spaces. ...
RT @HJoyceGender: That the Royal College of NURSING, of all institutions, put a woman through this unwarranted and vicious witch/hunting procedure, is a disgrace https://t.co/U9hICw...
We would like to remind you that the belief that humans are sexed and that women are female is protected by the EA2010. https://t.co/lUA9pT...
There is nothing reactionary about thinking female people exist and should be recognised in law. Thinking women should be redefined as an inner gender essence on the other hand is reactionary af. https://t.co/zeCRBr...
"Why give this artist a platform for her outmoded opinions that clearly offend the Trans community?" B/c female ppl exist, our existence is not 'outmoded,' we don't have to consent to our erasure b/c it offends trans people, and our right to say this ...
RT @joannaccherry: Great to hear @JessDeWahls on @BBCr4today on the complete apology she received from the Chief of the @royalacademy for the wrongful allegations of transphobia made against her. She hopes its a turning point for other institutions ...
RT @mbmpolicy: We have been researching gender self-identification and women's rights for 2.5 years. All of our work is available on an open access basis and can be found on our website. https://t.co/LUCZTm...
Once more for the people at the back: People who think there is something dehumanising about being female are misogynists. https://t.co/N8Yg7m...